We and selected third parties use cookies or similar technologies for technical purposes and, with your consent, for experience and measurement as specified in the cookie policy.
You can freely give, deny, or withdraw your consent at any time by accessing the preferences panel. Denying consent may make related features unavailable.
Use the "Accept" button to consent. Use the "Reject" button to continue without accepting.
BOUNDARYLESS CONVERSATIONS PODCAST — SEASON 2 EP #2
Alicia Hennig stresses that in the 21st century, we need a better idea about the diversity of thinking and philosophical approaches around the world, to inform management and business ethics. Chinese thinking in general — and Daoism in particular — seem to offer a fruitful ground for developing management approaches or designing organizational models rooted in embeddedness.
Today we have the pleasure of introducing a very interesting academic voice, Alicia Hennig, Associate Professor of Business Ethics.
Her research focuses on Chinese philosophy and its application in organisations in the context of values, ethics and innovation. Working with Chinese as well as foreign companies in China, she continues to promote a better understanding of Chinese culture and thinking.
This conversation with Alicia was very crucial to explore the embracing of “embeddedness” (or entanglement). It’s about the critical need for organizations to see themselves as connected to the world they exist within. It turns out that Chinese philosophies, especially Daoism, are very much based on this concept of embeddedness. Daoism can provide Chinese management thinking with mindsets that seem to be rare in most of Western cultural traditions, and that may be more apt for a time of systemic shift.
We also talk about the paradox between globalisation, technological progress and contextual, indigenous approaches to management — in relation with embeddedness. Will China’s next generation of managers resist the universalising power of technology, considering how the country has leap-frogged in recent decades? By not striving for coherence like most Western philosophies, perhaps Chinese thinking really is more resilient to such forces and can more easily provide a platform for evolution in management, as stories like that of Haier seem to demonstrate.
Alicia also talks passionately about the role of education everywhere in the world to showcase the richness of philosophies, wishing that more universities and business schools would diversify their curriculum to include Chinese, but also Indian, African and other philosophical traditions. It’s indeed a shared passion that we want to continue to explore with her in the coming months.
To find out more about Alicia’s work:
Other references and mentions:
Find out more about the show and the research at Boundaryless at: https://boundaryless.io/resources/podcast/
Thanks for the ad-hoc music to Liosound / Walter Mobilio. Find his portfolio here: www.platformdesigntoolkit.com/music
Recorded on 18 September 2020.
1. The idea of embeddedness — understanding inter-relationality and interdependency with our external environment — is extremely helpful to understand what ethics and ethical action means. When we really believe in embeddedness, we are forced to think more detailed about the consequences of our action on all our surroundings— something that somehow got lost in much Western philosophy. There is therefore a great potential in looking at Chinese philosophy for inspiration on how to run a company, based on which ethical principles, since it gives me a whole logical system of embeddedness: its three-way system that aims at achieving harmony not just between the human being and the cosmos (or “god”) but also with nature as it encompasses and embeds the human. This system of thought may also contribute to a layered and “networked” thinking, reckoning with the idea that my actions can resonate through two or three nodes in a network.
2. Education will be essential to nurture a wider understanding of diverse philosophical and ethical apporaches. Alicia is not for any convergence, but for an acceptance of differences, believing we can generally learn from each other’s differences. University curricula and management trainings alike need to, first of all, include the paradigm of embeddedness and learning to understand that there are interdependencies, but also put forward other streams of thinking coming from Indian philosophy, Aftrican philosophy, etc.
3. When it comes to shaping organizations, the depth of foundational ideologies and “thinking sytems” should not be underestimated. In Haier for example — a company recognized as pioneering and one we work with since long — there is a foundational ideology inspired by Daoism, infusing a consistent system of thinking. If you just try to copy this approach on the surface, the ideological part is missing that essentially holds the company together and attract people to join and thrive within the system.
? Boundaryless Conversations Podcast is about exploring the future of large scale organizing by leveraging on technology, network effects and shaping narratives. We explore how platforms can help us play with a world in turmoil, change, and transformation: a world that is at the same time more interconnected and interdependent than ever but also more conflictual and rivalrous.
New podcast episodes, reports, webinars, and updates, directly in your inbox. Signal, not spam.